Years ago I was asked to
name the single most important trait a successful teacher should have. At the
time, my response was, “An elastic sense of humor.” Recently I was asked the
same question. After decades of teaching,
my answer is “a toss-up between patience, perseverance, and thinking on your feet.”
Literature
in the Media began with a blown bulb in the projector. Not easily reparable
as this was one of the new mega-gimmicky attached-to-the-ceiling wireless
projectors whose bulbs are viciously expensive. “Not a problem,” noted the
school’s media equipment Mr. Fixit, “It’s still under warranty. I’ll put in the
order right now.” So he whipped out his iPhone and dialed. Of course, no one
had either an empty classroom or an available portable projector that period,
so I took Coach John Heisman’s famous advice, “When in doubt, punt.” In the remaining
minutes of class, the students and I discussed what made a movie “Good,” Bad,” “Passable,”
or “A Waste of Time.” The depth of their responses led me to create a course
whose purpose was to teach critical media literacy.
First
Period AP Literature started
off normally as the students wrote their bell-ringer journal entries on a
Debussy quote while his music played in the background. I opened the discussion
of the assigned chapter of Thomas C. Foster’s How to Read Literature Like a Professor (a text the students enjoyed even more than I anticipated) in my normal
fashion; “Anyone have any questions or comments?” After several minutes of
interested back-and-forth, Katie raised her hand and asked, “Ms. Mayer, what’s phallic mean?” I hesitated for a
second, thought, “This is AP and they are seniors in high school.” and answered, “It’s an adjective reference to a
penis.” Total silence. Katie looked stunned, gathered herself and said, “What?
How is that a symbol?” I explained the symbolism and how it could be used
in characterization, for example, if applied to a car or perhaps a stereo
system and that the reference was not always attached to shape. “Oh,” Katie
nodded. “So, it’s like a ‘mine’s bigger than yours’ type thing. That is so
cool. I have got to remember that.” Needless to say, it took work and focus to
get the class back on the task of discussing the remainder of Professor Foster’s
chapter on possible meanings of communion.
The next
two sections of AP began with
students walking in the door asking if we were really going to be talking about
phallic symbolism. I sighed each time, considered the amazingly efficient
communication network that exists in high school hallways, and basically
repeated my initial remarks and the inevitable forcing of minds back to the
assigned topic.
I looked
forward to Speech I because I thought nothing could complicate an
impromptu about modes of transportation. During an impromptu, I place a list of
topics on the lectern, and call the students up at random to speak on a topic
for 60 seconds. This day’s list was 42 modes of transport from kayak to
elephant. All went well for three speakers, then, Halley looked up from the
list and asked, “What’s a stagecoach?” I replied. She decided to choose “motorcycle.”
Four speakers later, Kris asked, “What’s a wagon train?” Again, I explained. He
opted for “camel.” Nine more students spoke, then, Chance asked, “What’s a
carriage?” I told him and he chose “scooter” and quipped, “I hope it was the
kind that had a gasoline engine.”
Some days I was
certain I was making a difference in the lives of children and other days I was
equally certain they were put on this earth to test my desire to teach. On
those latter days, I reminded myself of two things: (1) the half-century
between our ages meant an enormous cultural gap exists and (2) there’s always
tomorrow.
Who knew Scarlett O’Hara was a sage?
No comments:
Post a Comment