Several times in
the last two weeks, I have been asked if I have pictures of my family,
especially Mom, with me. To my chagrin, I had to reply in the negative.
I have hundreds
of family pictures but they are all digitized and safely stored in the iPad and
in the cloud. What I do not have are wallet pictures. I wonder if people even
do that anymore…carry Kodak moments in their wallets. Most folk I know carry
images and small videos in the cell-phones, which is less than useless here in
the middle of the North Atlantic. Is this another instance of the divide
between digital natives and those who dwell in the analog past?
Digital images
never fade. They remain as crisp and colorful as the instant they were created.
Generations from now, descendants will call up a picture of great-great-great
Grandpapa in all his startling reality. What will we have lost when those
ancient images are no longer blurred and faded with age? Will some of the
romance of the past die with them? Will future children never enjoy the wonder
of the hunt to find when and where the picture was taken because it was geo-tagged
so can never be lost?
I miss those
evenings when the family gathered around the photo albums and speculated about
many of the yellowed and faded images pasted there. Where was Pop when he was snapped wearing
those hideous sheep-skin chaps? (Dad thought it was Idaho; Mom thought it was
Montana.) What was the color of Uncle Will’s sporty roadster displayed in the
1926 photograph? What color were Great-Grandma
Moore’s eyes? No one knows, but the mystery lead to lively discussions and
conjectures. These moments of wondering add a degree of imagination to family
history; will future Mayers lose this magic as they leaf though album after
album on their iPads or iPhones?
I have been
scanning old family photographs and tintypes so we don’t lose the images when
their paper finally dies. Intellectually, I recognize the advantage of
digitizing, but viscerally, I almost pity my future nieces and nephews who will
never have the opportunity to hold the crinkled paper images of their
ancestors. It’s much like the arguments for and against e-books and
audio-books. The portability of digital versions is obvious but there’s just
something electric about the tangible feel of a book or photograph against your
fingers.
No comments:
Post a Comment